Perceptions of Cebuano mothers about the Reproductive Health Law

Keywords: Cebuano mothers, descriptive phenomenology, perception, reproductive health law

Abstract

The study made use of Husserlian transcendental (descriptive) qualitative design to determine Cebuano mothers’ perceptions about the RH Law. The research was conducted in Cebu City particularly in Cebu North, Barangay Talamban. The study gathered information from eight (8) purposively chosen Cebuano mothers who have lived in Cebu City for the last six to ten years representing the different sectors: those who are college graduates, high school graduates, and those who are in church organizations. A semi-structured interview was used to gather the data. All information that was gathered from the informants were recorded. In order to analyze the data, Colaizzi's methodological way to deal with phenomenological inquiry was utilized. Based on the interviews of the informants, themes were derived that were categorized into the pros and cons of RH Law. Other themes of the study include RH Law being a population regulator, a forerunner of birth control methods and as a birth spacer. Sub-themes were also identified such as the RH Law as a promoter of artificial birth control, a solution to unwanted pregnancy and abortion, against the divine law, and a solution to poverty. ased on the findings of the study it was concluded that culture and religion play a pivotal role in influencing people to have varied, differing perceptions/perspectives. How a person puts meaning to a situation is greatly influenced by culture and religion.

 

References

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Chapter 7: Human Society. Science for all Americans. Retrieved December 1 2012 from www.project 2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/chap7.htm

2. Colaizzi, P.F. (1978) Psychological research as a phenomenologist views it. In: R.S. Valle and M. King (Eds.) Existential-Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology (pp. 48-71). New York, USA: Oxford University Press,

3. David, R. (2011, May 15). Debating the RH bill. Philippine Daily Inqyuirer, p. 6

4. Family Income and Expenditure Survey (2003). Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES) 2003: Final report.

5. Family Planning Survey (2006). Final Report. National Statistics Office. Republic of the Philippines.

6. Gorospe, V. (1969). The Church and the Regulation of Birth: After Humanae Vitae. Philippine Studies, 17(3), 556-585.

7. Green, R. M. (2001). The human embryo research debates: Bioethics in the vortex of controversy. UK: Oxford University Press.

8. Juarez, F., Cabigon, J., Singh, S. & Hussain, R. (2005). The incidence of induced abortion in the Philippines: Current levels and recent trends. International Family Planning Perspectives, 31(3) ,140-149.

9. Likhaan Center for Women’s Health Incorporated, 2011. Ten good reasons to pass the RH Bill now. Retrieved December 9, 2012 from http://www.likhaan.org/content/ten-good-reasons-pass-rh-bill-now.

10. Lumayag, R., Daconte, C., Orasco. K. M., Bejo, S. M., Ado, J., Flotilde, V., et al (2011). Perception od College Business Administration (CBA) students at CapSu Main Campus towards reproductive health(RH) bill. Research
project . Capiz State University

11. Macaraig, A. (2012). The 7 Deadly Sins of the RH bill. Retrived November 28, 2012 from https://www.rappler.com/nation/10596-the-7-deadly-sins-of-the-rh-bill-–-sotto

12. Macklin, R. (2012). Ethics in global health: research, policy and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

13. National Demographic and Health Survey (2003). National Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) 2003: Final report.

14. Philippine Legislators’ Committee on Population and Development Foundation Inc., (2011). HB 4244. An act providing for a comprehensive policy on responsible parenthood, reproductive health and population and development and for other purposes. Retrieved November 30, 2012 from http://www.plcpd.com/legislative-agenda/the-rh-bill/rh-bill-text/

15. Porcalla, D. (2013, January 3). RH law to take effect Jan. 17. The Philippine Star. Retrieved April 22, 2014 from http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2013/01/03/892746/rh-law-take-effect-jan.-17

16. Sambajon, M. J. (2012). Declaration of strong opposition to the passage of the RH Bill. Retrived February 16, 2013 from https://www.scribd.com/document/113606394/DECLARATION-OF-STRONG-OPPOSITION-TO-THE-PASSAGE-OF-THE-RH-BILL-INTO-LAW-AN-OPEN-APPEAL-TO-THE-PHILIPPINE-LAWMAKERS

17. Pernia, E. M., Alabastro-Quimbo, S., Abrenica, M. J. V., Alonzo, R. P., Arcenas, A. L., Balisacan, A. M., ... & de Dios, E. S. (2011). Population, poverty, politics and the Reproductive Health bill (No. 2011, 01). Discussion
paper//School of Economics, University of the Philippines.

18. Stephens, M., Jordens, C. F., Kerridge, I. H., & Ankeny, R. A. (2010). Religious perspectives on abortion and a secular response. Journal of Religion and Health, 49(4), 513-535.

19. Tumbokon, D. (2012). Reproductive Health Bill. Retrived December 29, 2012, from https://www.scribd.com/document/267729402/Reproductive-Health-Bill
Published
2016-12-18
How to Cite
Rama, M. C. I., Picardo, R. L., & Aranas, M. A. A. (2016). Perceptions of Cebuano mothers about the Reproductive Health Law. University of the Visayas - Journal of Research, 10(1), 49-58. Retrieved from http://uvjor.ph/index.php/uvjor/article/view/129